This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
Welcome to Reed Smith's viewpoints — timely commentary from our lawyers on topics relevant to your business and wider industry. Browse to see the latest news and subscribe to receive updates on topics that matter to you, directly to your mailbox.
| less than a minute read

Value-based care to see significant changes with implementation of Stark and Anti-Kickback final rules

As part of Reed Smith's new digital white paper, "Outlook: US Health Care 2021," my Reed Smith colleagues, Nicole Aiken-Shaban and James Hennessy, describe new rules that guide those currently engaged or seeking to engage, in value-based arrangements that may otherwise implicate the federal Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute.

I encourage you to review their article. I am certain their narrative will help you gain more clarity about the contours of the new rules.

These final rules primarily aim to remove obstacles to value-based care, which enables payers and health systems to reward health care providers and suppliers for adopting cost-saving protocols, avoiding waste, and improving quality of care. Both the Stark Law and AKS were developed to address fraud and abuse concerns in a predominantly fee-for-service health care reimbursement environment. As a result of increased interest and investment in value-based care, HHS recognized the need for new exceptions and safe harbors to provide flexibility for value-based arrangements.


health care & life sciences, value-based arrangements, anti-kickback statute, starklaw