This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
Welcome to Reed Smith's viewpoints — timely commentary from our lawyers on topics relevant to your business and wider industry. Browse to see the latest news and subscribe to receive updates on topics that matter to you, directly to your mailbox.
| less than a minute read

Public Interest Affects Discovery Dispute in Kansas Voting Case

The amount in controversy is weighed heavily in most discovery proportionality analyses, but public interest can also impact a court’s decision about whether, or how much, to limit discovery in some cases. For example, in VoteAmerica v. SchwabNo. 21-2253-KHV-GEB, 2022 BL 191442 (D. Kan. June 02, 2022), the plaintiff declined to provide information in response to discovery requests which were allegedly too broad and disproportional to the needs of the case. In its proportionality analysis, the court noted that injunctions were being sought in addition to monetary damages. The court ruled that public interest matters – such as a state’s ability to ensure that its elections are “honest and orderly” – may outweigh the financial amount in controversy. Though the court did grant the defendant’s request to produce, it included additional stipulations to limit the scope of the production. Additional information on the case is available in the Exterro case law alert, which features my brief “expert commentary.”

…the importance of determining the First and Fourteenth Amendment Rights of Plaintiff as weighed against the right of the State to ensure its elections are honest and orderly, from a proportionality standpoint, far outweighs the limited fiscal amount in controversy.


ediscovery, e-discovery, proportionality, 26b