This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
viewpoints
Welcome to Reed Smith's viewpoints — timely commentary from our lawyers on topics relevant to your business and wider industry. Browse to see the latest news and subscribe to receive updates on topics that matter to you, directly to your mailbox.
| less than a minute read

Regulation of PFAS in consumer care products: a test case for unintentional exposure in California

With increasing scrutiny on the presence of PFAS in consumer products, states have been rolling rolling out new legislation aimed at limiting or eliminating intentionally added PFAS, beginning with menstrual products where there is a perceived gap in regulation

California's legislation seeks to regulate both intentionally and unintentionally added PFAS. Questions are already swirling as to how to regulate the unintentional addition of chemicals that are ubiquitous in the environment and the additional requirements for manufacturers to monitor all aspects of the supply chain where unintentional exposure may occur. 

For manufacturers of menstrual products, and other consumer care products that may ultimately be subject to the same scrutiny, industry experts suggest starting with a thorough review of the supply chain.

Manufacturers’ first step should be to conduct a desktop analysis to see whether PFAS compounds are currently identifiable throughout the supply chain, Baroni said. Manufacturers should also look at which compounds come up repeatedly in the intentionally added category, versus which compounds are more obscure and not intentionally added, she said.

Tags

pfas, menstrual products, chemical byproducts, esg