This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
viewpoints
Welcome to Reed Smith's viewpoints — timely commentary from our lawyers on topics relevant to your business and wider industry. Browse to see the latest news and subscribe to receive updates on topics that matter to you, directly to your mailbox.
| less than a minute read

Veto means no new AI regulation for the Data Center Capital of the World

Virginia's High-Risk Artificial Intelligence Developer and Deployer Act (HB2094), passed in February, would have regulated AI in the commonwealth.  Specifically, it would have created requirements for the development, deployment, and use of “high-risk” artificial intelligence systems, as defined in the bill, and civil penalties for noncompliance to be enforced by the Attorney General.  

This week Governor Youngkin vetoed the bill, concluding that it would establish a burdensome AI regulatory framework.  However, he noted his support for governance of AI, and steps the Virginia executive branch has already taken to establish safeguards and oversight for AI use.  

This veto follows increased advocacy in recent months for accelerating the development and deployment of AI systems, with advocates often arguing that legislation placing additional guardrails on AI would also stifle progress.  Virginia, known as the Data Center Capital of the World, has a strong tech sector, including in the cybersecurity and defense spaces. Its measured governance and oversight of AI should help Virginia businesses stay on on the cutting edge of AI development and deployment.  

The role of government in safeguarding AI practices should be one that enables and empowers innovators to create and grow, not one that stifles progress and places onerous burdens on our Commonwealth’s many business owners. This bill would harm the creation of new jobs, the attraction of new business investment, and the availability of innovative technology in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Accordingly, I veto this bill

Tags

artificial intelligence, ai, ip, intellectual property