This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
viewpoints
Welcome to Reed Smith's viewpoints — timely commentary from our lawyers on topics relevant to your business and wider industry. Browse to see the latest news and subscribe to receive updates on topics that matter to you, directly to your mailbox.
| less than a minute read

Content monitoring and tech platform liability

On 3 October 2019, the CJEU handed down its judgment in Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland Limited. The landmark decision means that the rule against general monitoring obligations (Article 15 of the E-Commerce Directive) does not preclude EU member states’ national courts from ordering hosting platforms like Facebook to take down illegal user-generated content, as well as any content which is ‘identical’ or ‘equivalent’ to content which has previously been declared illegal, on an on-going, world-wide basis. 

Aside from potentially creating on-going monitoring obligations for platforms, the decision has been accused of paving the way to global censorship by bringing the loosely defined concepts of ‘identical’ and ‘equivalent’ content within the remit of what platforms can be required to police, and allowing censorship-prone countries to impose their laws worldwide. 

This note discusses the decision, its shortcomings and its potential wider impact. As always, a pleasure collaborating with my colleague @Carolyn Pepper, this time to dissect the wider implications of this judgment in our recent client alert.

Monitoring online content: the impact of Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland Limited

Tags

entertainment & media

Latest Insights

post featured image
post featured image